When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On February 9, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B, who was punished for a drunk driving, through C, that “The Defendant would have a member of the Seoul Prosecutor’s Office, who is in charge of the president of the Seoul Prosecutor’s Office, and would be subject to a disposition for no suspicion.”

However, the fact was that the defendant was not the chairperson of the prosecutor's office, and there was no person who wants to take the director of the prosecutor's office, and only he was thought to use the money for the cost of living with the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received one million won from the victim to the deposit account of community credit cooperatives (D) in the name of the defendant on the same day, and acquired it by deceit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of B of the police statement protocol and the Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) is based on the same records of the defendant, the amount of fraud, and the degree of illegality of deception, and that an agreement has been reached with the victim after the summary indictment, the same sentence as