However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From August 2018 to October 12, 2018, the Defendant received 80,000 won from male customers who find out such places in Seoul Jung-gu Office Officetel Btel C in return for sexual traffic, and had the Thailand, female D, etc., an employee, have sexual intercourse with the above male customers.

As a result, the Defendant stated that the indictment for arranging sexual traffic was an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc., but the prosecutor applied Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. to the applicable provisions of Acts, thereby instituting the instant prosecution, and thus, he/she did not put any disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A E-document;

1. Investigation report (Calculation of profits from the sexual traffic);

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of field photographs);

1. Application of lease contract Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of violating the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. with the reason of sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is a criminal highly harmful to the society by commercializing sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals. It is not good that the crime is committed in light of the period, method and the size of profits acquired by

However, the fact that the defendant shows the appearance to recognize the crime of this case and reflects the wrongness, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime is considered as favorable to the defendant, and the age, character, character, environment, and environment of the defendant.