Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her duties on January 24, 2017, within the “D” managed by the victim C (n, 61 years of age) located in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, and on the ground that he/she restricted the use of a mobile phone in a limited fluor, the Defendant’s interference with his/her duties to employees of the fluorian.

Whether they interfere with the sale of property or not.

The death shall be discarded.

"Abruting and assaulting the users of the above businesses such as "," and obstructing the business of the victim's above businesses for about 30 minutes by force by creating anxiety.

2. The Defendant used a mobile phone at the time, at the time, at the time, and at the same time, at the same time, at the above D employee E (V, 54 years old), the victim E (hereinafter referred to as the “F”) expressed that the use of a mobile phone would be dangerous and that it would be prevented, and assault the victim E by putting the victim’s back water on his hand, and selling the victim E’s back water on his hand. As the victim F (V, 33 years old), who observed this assaulted the Defendant, the victim F. (V, 33 years old), who heard the Defendant, “I am, I am for the same year, I am, and am dead, and am for cosmetics.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C, E, and F;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;