beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.07.12 2016가단29233

채무금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. On November 16, 1968, the Plaintiff got a marriage, and the Defendant, who is the Plaintiff’s punishment, was working for the Defendant to receive money from the marriage ceremony.

After the plaintiff's confirmation, 150,000 won was received as a result of the plaintiff's confirmation, and the defendant did not return it to the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant is obligated to return 120,000 won after deducting 30,000 won that the plaintiff borrowed from the defendant among the above congratulatory money.

B. Around August 1969, the Plaintiff: (a) leased a bank that remodeled the warehouse of the non-farch factory in Seoul, which the Defendant operated by the Defendant; (b) paid KRW 150,000 to the Defendant; (c) paid KRW 80,000 out of the deposit to the Defendant for three months; and (d) paid KRW 80,000 from the deposit to the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant is obligated to return the deposit to the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff’s wife lent KRW 20,000 to the Defendant over ten times from around 1974 to around 1976, and the Defendant did not repay KRW 250,000 among them.

On 1979, the Defendant was in a state of detention in which the accident was committed while driving a license without a license. However, the Plaintiff paid 300,000 won to the Defendant and appointed an attorney for the Defendant, and the Defendant was released.

E. The Defendant borrowed KRW 500,000 from the Plaintiff’s mother as business fund, and the Plaintiff’s mother was the Plaintiff’s mother before his death.

F. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the total sum of KRW 1,140,000,000, which is part of KRW 57,000,000 converted into the current value, and damages for delay.

2. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.