A. The Defendant is the owner of each land and obstacles (hereinafter “instant land, etc.”) indicated in the column for “receptors” in the attached Table of the attached Table within the instant project zone in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, implementing the AJ District Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. On December 22, 2011, the Defendant issued a public notice of the authorization to implement the instant project with Seongdong-gu public notice of the authorization to implement the instant project on the same year from February 20, 2012.

5. up to 9.0, the plaintiffs received the application for parcelling-out from the members, but the plaintiffs did not make the application for parcelling-out within the above period.

C. On November 14, 2012, Plaintiff 1 through 31 requested the Defendant to file an application for adjudication on expropriation of the instant land, etc. with the competent Land Tribunal. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant obtained authorization for the management and disposal of the instant project to AM publicly notified by Seongdong-gu, and the same year.

5. On 26. 26. The Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee filed an application for adjudication of expropriation.

On July 25, 2014, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee shall begin the commencement date of expropriation on the same year.

9. On December 12, 199, the Korea Land Expropriation Corporation and the Korean Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Expropriation Adjudication”) adjudicated the compensation for the instant land, etc. in the manner of taking an arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of each appraisal by the ordinary appraisal corporation and the Korean Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Expropriation Adjudication”). The Plaintiffs filed an objection against the result of the adjudication with the Central Land Expropriation Committee.

E. On April 23, 2015, the Central Land Expropriation Committee has partially changed compensation for the instant land, etc. into the money indicated in the column of “Objection Ruling” in the attached Table in a manner that arithmetic average of each appraisal result of the central appraisal corporation and the appraisal corporation E-Appraisal Corporation. On the other hand, the Defendant’s delay of application for adjudication asserted by Plaintiff 1 through 31.