However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 20, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 20, 2008, and a fine of three million won for the same crime at the same court on July 28, 2011, respectively.

On April 14, 2017, at around 22:15, the Defendant driven a e-mail XD car without a driver's license, while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.182% in blood at approximately 30 meters from the D middle school in front of the D middle school located in Gwangju Northern-gu B, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Electronic data;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry requests, such as criminal history, and investigation report Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

A. Unfavorable conditions: The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he was punished on three occasions in 200, 2008 and 2011 due to driving under drinking.

(b) favorable conditions: the fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that he has no record of punishment heavier than suspended execution due to drinking, driving without a license, etc.

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.