기차교통방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, at around 14:45 on December 26, 2012, when he lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to editorial type illness, was boarding the train in the Cheongneung Station C-Ulle C-Ulle Park C-Ulle Park at around 15:30 on the same day, and when the train proceeds from the 6th to 1st of the train, the Defendant opened the power distribution team, the water supply valve installed in the passage of each guest room, and turned off all the front lights of the train, the passenger room, and the corridor by opening the water valve so that the front lights of the train, the passenger room, and the corridor can be discharged in the water tank of the toilet and the spacke, thereby hindering the above train from stopping of the train by making the vehicle stop between 8 minutes of water supply in the station for emergency purpose.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. A E statement, and a witness identification certificate of F;
1. A mental appraisal statement concerning the preparation of a medical doctor G;
1. Application of each investigation report (the intensity of a criminal scene, delayed operation of a damaged train), crime and arrest site, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs to damaged trains;
1. Article 186 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
2. The reason for sentencing under Articles 10(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act that statutory mitigation is reasonable, although the Defendant has committed the instant crime, the instant crime is against himself/herself, the Defendant interfered with the traffic of a train, resulting in inconvenience to many passengers using a train which is a mass means of transportation, resulting in considerable social damage, and due to the characteristics of railroad transportation, the traffic interference of a train leads to large hand, and thus, the risk of the relevant crime is high, and the Defendant has no specific residence, who was punished for committing the instant crime, such as theft, damage of property, fraud, etc., as well as the history of punishment for committing the instant crime.