beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단1349

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 11:40 on December 15, 2017, the Defendant issued an order to the Soviet the Soviet Union at the D cafeteria operated by Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the Soviet Union at around 11:40 on December 15, 2017 and food together with the Soviet Union at the Soviet Union.

“I,” and “I, if you are sking, will be bad.”

”라고 크게 소리를 지르며 “ 씹할, 좃 팔.” 등으로 욕설하고, 옆에서 식사하는 다른 손님에게 시비를 거는 등 소란을 피워 손님들이 밖으로 나가고 들어오지 못하게 하는 등 위력으로 약 40 분간 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

The Defendant “G” restaurant operated by the Victim F in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E from December 9, 2017 to December 23:40 of the same day, from around 23:00 to 23:40 of the same day, the Defendant of “2018 Highest 180,” voiced the Defendant “hacker of the Gam, outside,” and “hacker” to customers under the influence of alcohol by drinking alcohol. The Defendant, “hacker.”

Duchch fluor;

Chewing, how to report to the police, and how to see, “I am..”, etc., which interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1349"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with H and C "2018 Highest 1880";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime (the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of punishment: Fines of not less than 50,000 won but not more than 22,500,000 won;

2. The sentencing criteria shall not apply since the decision of sentencing was made by selecting a fine for negligence: The defendant, who is a fine of five million won, is not well-founded even during the period of suspension of execution, and the nature of each of the crimes in this case is not good.

However, the defendant recognizes all of the crimes of this case.