However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 24, 2018, at around 21:10, the Defendant driven a B-typ vehicle with the alcohol concentration of about 0.151% while under the influence of alcohol in the middle of blood without obtaining a driver's license from the Do in front of the rental village to the front of the same 3km village.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment to prevent recidivism shall be determined by taking into consideration the following circumstances: (a) favorable circumstances, such as the defendant’s wrongness against the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act; (b) the defendant’s previous offense, age, family environment; (c) the interval between his/her previous offense and his/her previous offense; (d) the time frame of the offense in this case; (e) the degree of alcohol alcohol in the defendant’s blood alcohol level at the time of the offense; (e) the distance of drinking and unlicensed driving; and (e) the circumstances after the offense, etc.