At around 21:00 on December 19, 2013, the Defendant got out of the D office located in Masung-gun, Masung-gun, the victim E (Nam, 52 years of age) was seated in the cargo driver's seat where the victim E was parked on the street, and the Defendant heard that “I would not see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would have to kill and me, and that I would like to see the Defendant’s erode.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the son.

Therefore, the Defendant alleged from the beginning that the Defendant did not err by her age, and whether the Defendant was her inner son or not, and that the Defendant did not constitute a dangerous thing with alkinium (13 cm in length) defense counsel, which is a dangerous thing with alkinium, alkin (13 cm in length) alkin, which is a dangerous thing alkin’s dangerous thing with alkin’s alkin, during the Defendant’s dispute, the Defendant’s act of using the dangerous thing should be determined depending on whether the other party or the third party could cause harm to her life or body (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do10256, Nov. 11, 2010). In light of the fact that the Defendant’s act of causing harm to the Defendant’s body as well as the act of causing harm to the victim, even if the Defendant’s act of causing harm to the victim by using the alknin law, etc. as well as the Defendant’s body.

In addition, the upper part of the victim's left eyebrow was covered by the victim's hair in the cargo mold.

This is a dangerous thing.