At around 02:18 on January 4, 2015, the Defendant publicly insultingd 73, 75, 112, i.e., Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Hancheon-ro, 73-gil Children’s Park, and 112, i.e., i., i., e., e., hata., hata., hata. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.) by the Defendant, without any reason, two persons, including E, in the state of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. G’s written statement (the Defendant asserted that he did not take a bath against D who is the victim police officer, but took a bath against E who bears a vision. However, according to the duly adopted and investigated evidence, the Defendant’s assertion that he expressed not only the above E but also the police officer D’s desire to take a cexch. Thus, the above assertion is without merit). The application of the law is without merit.

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse (in cases of conversion of KRW 100,000 per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) (Article 59(1) only that the defendant has been punished twice by a fine,