2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On March 8, 2012, Plaintiff A is a person who was subject to the Defendant Hospital’s instant surgery and the pelping of the award, division, and cutting of malicious I and Haak (hereinafter “instant surgery”) at the Defendant Hospital. Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

B. On August 17, 2010, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital for symptoms, such as an internal-face name, etc.

다. 피고 병원 의료진은 2012. 3. 8.경 원고 A에게 르포트 I형 절골술을 이용하여 상악(윗턱뼈)을 잘라 정면으로 보았을 때 회전시키고 하악의 하악체(아래턱의 몸통 부위)를 양측으로 갈라 부러트려서 치아가 있는 턱뼈와 관절이 있는 턱뼈 부위를 분리하고 관절 부위는 그대로 둔 상태에서 좌측은 앞으로 전진시키고 우측은 뒤로 후진시켜서 다시 고정시키는 이 사건 수술을 시행하였다. 라.

1) On March 12, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital removed the hedge, i.e., a pulse pulse fat, inserted at the time of the instant surgery, around 14:00, around March 14, 2012. (2) The Plaintiff complained of the symptoms and face face of snow water and the left-hand side of the snow on the same day, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observed the progress after prescribing an artificial eye to A.

3) Around March 14, 2012, the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital inserted the amount of fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor through the mouth of the Plaintiff A, but the fluorial fluor was not well good, and the symptoms, left-hand fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, the left-hand fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, the Defendant Hospital’s medical professionals removed the amount of fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, which

5 The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital shall check the bordering, etc. on the bottom of the bar, which removed the left hemball around March 23, 2012, and after checking the bordering, etc. of 5 meters of the above part.