However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million on August 18, 2009 and a fine of KRW 5 million on March 12, 2013 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch.

At around 01:30 on August 14, 2013, the Defendant, while driving a D SP car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.253% without a driver’s license, was negligent in the course of his duties, when the Defendant neglected the duty of Jeonju City while driving along five lanes from the 6-lane in the direction of the TF distance to the TF distance, while driving along the PPP in the direction of the TF distance, the Defendant: (a) neglected to perform the duty of Jeonju City; (b) caused the f-ropaner of the victim E (55 years old) who is trafficed in the same lane to the front driver of the driver’s license; and (c) caused the said taxi to become the rear driver of the G driver’s vehicle, and (d) caused the said taxi to become the rear driver of the G driver’s vehicle.

The Defendant suffered from the victim E and the victim I (n, 26 years of age), and the victimJ (n, 25 years of age) each of the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim E and the victim K (n, n, n, n, n, n) for about two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim K (n, n, n, and 26 years of age) for about three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each statement of E, K, G, I, and J;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. The report on the request for appraisal (including the attached report on blood alcohol content), and the investigation report (number 15);

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (number 9);

1. Photographs of the destruction of and damage to vehicles involved in the accident and photographs on the accident site;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal history records and statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 7, and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 152 subparagraph 1, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Alternative Traffic Accidents;