사기등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The amount obtained by deception is relatively small, and some victims do not want to punish the defendant.
However, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated commission of the same type of crime, and committed the instant crime in spite of the history of punishment several times as a violent crime and a crime of fraud, and in particular, even though the prosecution was instituted on May 7, 2015 and the trial is continuing, the Defendant did not appear in the trial and did not cause the other crime, and the liability for the instant crime is not somewhat weak.
In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.