If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C urban buses.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:13, at the end of Jongno-gu Seoul, 2013, the fourth-lane of the 4-lane road in front of the 4-lane building in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 71-2, where the 4-lane 1 side of the 4-lane road is in front of the 4-lane building, and the 2-lane 1 side from the intersection to the intersection to the intersection at the speed of about 20 km, and the 2-lane 2 side of the

At the time, there was a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed at night and on the front side, so there was a duty of care to check whether there was a person who gets on a road driving service to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to safely drive the vehicle.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the victim D (the age of 37) did not find that the crosswalk installed on the front side is crossing from the right side to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and by neglecting it, the part of the above bus, which is the front part of the right side of the bus, is shocked to the part of the victim's bridge, making the victim go beyond the victim, and then both of the victim's two sides with the right side wheels.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence to the victim D, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Statement of the occurrence of E traffic accident;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (D) statute;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant shocks the victim who has dried the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signals of the crosswalk and the degree of the victim's injury.