A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a defendant B to eight months, and for a year, for a defendant C, respectively.

(b).

Basic Facts

1. The status of the I and the Defendants, Inc., Ltd., using more than 300 workers, are companies that classify them into K in each type of model (hereinafter “Stong”) and supply them to K in order to facilitate the assembly of parts of motor vehicles by being awarded a contract by J, a prime contractor, a stock company.

The Defendants are the members of the above Corporation I’s employees, the members of the labor union established on October 4, 2016, and the members of the non-permanent metal labor union L, and Defendant A is the chief of the above labor union site, Defendant B is the chief of the above labor union site, and Defendant C is the above labor union representatives.

2. On December 30, 2016, Plaintiff I’s closure of business and the labor union labor union’s labor union’s labor union (“I”) submitted a written report of the operation of a business body to J, the Cheongwon, the Cheongwon Co., Ltd. around December 30, 2016, and on February 1, 2017, it entered the order of the closure of business through the phased return and transfer of the business.

Accordingly, the above metal labor union L 100 decided from February 2, 2017 to demand guarantee of future employment and succession of employment for electric power sources, and from around February 2017, the above I head office was the tent farming before the above I head office, and when the above I and the above I were to be negotiated with the above I and subsequently, they were put into dispute after the procedure of mediation.

Since around April 20, 2017, when the above corporation I suspended the entire process, the 150 persons of metal labor union L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L, as the above officers of the above corporation, and around April 24, 2017, the defendants asserted that the closure of business of the above corporation I was the process of "defishing" by K and J, a large company, without permission, invaded the documents of the corporation or the company's computer hard disc, and those related to the corporation, including NL, the chairperson of the above corporation.