When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 29, 2019, around 05:15, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the C District of the Silung Police Station located in Silung-si B; and (b) served as a 112 police officer of the Silung Police Station C District of the Silung Police Station, which called, “A passenger is a taxi driver, and does not occur in the si”; (c) took the Defendant’s shouldered in the sib; and (d) took the Defendant’s shouldered in the Dolung Police Station C District of the Silung Police Station of the Silung Police Station; and (d) took the Defendant’s bath to the said D, “I am flick and flick flick fl

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the form of a crime for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, the degree of obstruction to public duties such as assault, etc. is relatively minor, and the defendant is a student who has yet to age.