If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 30, 2016, at the convenience store located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property of the victim by taking advantage of cash payment instruments owned by the victim ethyl et al., which were set up in front of the convenience store; and (b) on the ground that the amount to be withdrawn is bad, the Defendant attempted to recover cash using the cash payment instruments owned by the victim ethyl et al., but did not have any money to be withdrawn; and (c) on the ground that the said small liquor was placed on the screen of the cash payment period, the Defendant destroyed the property of the victim so that the repair cost would amount to 6.90,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A criminal investigation report (a statement attached to a damage statement);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of a fine (including confession, reflection, the health status of a defendant, the agreement with a victim, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;