대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and two months, suspension of execution for a period of three years, etc.) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair;
2. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment by taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant.
In full view of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in this court, the judgment of the court below was judged to have exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion, or there is no special change in circumstances that may change the original court’s punishment.
In addition, even if comprehensively considering the sentencing factors revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, background and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because it is too unhued.
The prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.