If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant and the victim B(77) are neighbors.

1. On March 20, 2018, the Defendant found the Defendant’s residence as the Defendant’s house on the ground that the dog owned by Kimhae-si C and the son D (41 cm) from the victim’s children was prevented, opened the gate and opened it into a string and math, and “the opening is prohibited”;

N. L. L. L. L. L. L.C.

The body did not know about people, and the body was damaged by the victim's gate, such as avoiding the disturbance, and infringed upon the victim's residence.

2. On March 21, 2018, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) found the gate at the location specified in paragraph (1) for the same reason; (b) destroyed the locked of the gate, and entered as mash, thereby damaging the gate owned by the victim; (c) destroyed the gate, i.e., the h., the h., the h., “Arhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

As a result, the Defendant damaged the property equivalent to 423,00 won of the repair cost of capital, such as Seodaemun, and infringed on the residence of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D and B;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;