If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who worked as a cosmetic instructor in Seo-gu, Daejeon.

On October 5, 2012, at around 12:06, the Defendant had access to NAV, a Internet portal site, to NAD, and had the Defendant read the “F,” which is an instructor of E-school, by openly insulting the Defendant, in the column for the evaluation of cosmeticR and E-school page in competition with the Defendant’s cosmetic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness F’s statutory statement Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Considering the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the first offense, age, and reflects on the sentencing, the level of expression, and the intention of insult, etc. was not confirmed.