When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 17:30 on April 17, 2017, the Defendant: “E”, a store operated by the Victim D (W, 42 years of age) located in the Government of the Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do; “E”, a store for the Defendant’s home-to-face sales; “E”, a store for the Defendant’s home-to-face sales on the ground that the Defendant demanded a refund from the Victim’s home-to-face sales; and the Defendant’s home-to-face sales on the top of the Victim’s home-to-face sales store on the ground that the Victim’s home-to-face sales store did not respond to it; “Ie-to-day for the instant day-to-day day-to-day day-to-day day, fraud;

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the majority of the two-year children.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;