2. The judgment that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the wrongness, and that the defendant was on the part of the defendant.

C. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's wife appeals to the defendant's prior location, the fact that the amount of telephonephone addiction handled by the defendant is large and the profits acquired therefrom are not high, in light of addiction to narcotics and the harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc., narcotics crimes need to be strictly punished and eradicated. Meanwhile, the crime of selling and delivering phiphonephones like this case is highly likely to be criticized because they spread phiphones to the surrounding people. In particular, the defendant committed the crime in this case without being informed of the fact that he was punished several times for the same crime, especially during the period of repeated offense due to the same kind of crime, and in light of the fact that the defendant's flophoneismism was detected from his mother's clophonephoneism, the extent of punishment recommended by the Supreme Court for the crime in this case [the basic crime and crimes in this case: 1, 2, 3 months imprisonment with prison labor or more, 4 years imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime in this case; 4 years or more severe punishment (3 years).