On December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 3, 2016.

On May 2, 2016, the Defendant is engaged in pop-up in the Internet NAV in the vicinity of the Busan YY C, and the Defendant is engaged in the cop-up in the Korean car page.

The expression " shall be posted in writing and the victim E shall express his intention to purchase the money," and the victim E shall send the letter "on the first hand of the remittance of the money to a door."

Note .

“Along with F who falsely puts up a letter “Pop Popn” on the Popn Popn Popn Poper Poper Poper Ping him as if he/she was the victim, and send goods to Popn Popn Popn Popn Popn Popn Popn Popn Popn Ping Kwikset Co., Ltd. using Kwikset Co.

different types.

“Along on 10:20 on the same day, the victim was required to transfer KRW 3.45,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in F (Serial G) in the name of F, and the Defendant was directly sent from F a half of the amount equivalent to the above amount.

In fact, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to send the money, etc.

Ultimately, the summary of the evidence that the defendant abused 3450,000 won by deceiving the victim.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. A written petition;

1. Details of passbook transactions, currency details, and confirmation of Kwikset service place, such as goods and Kakao Stockholm photographs;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Act: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 39(1) was detained for the same kind of crime, and two months have not yet passed since the Defendant was released as the revocation of detention during the trial; (b) the Defendant had been punished several times for the same crime; and (c) the damage has not yet been recovered.

In addition, the degree of damage caused by this case has become final and conclusive.