2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

A. The Plaintiff, as a hub belonging to D, has created and operated E in a well-known manner as well-known manner, and the Defendant is a person who uses the Internet website (www.bebe.com; hereinafter “the Internet site of this case”) as an clinic of “F”.

B. On November 22, 2013, G puts the Plaintiff’s Twitter a letter “H” into the Plaintiff’s Twitter. The instant case was published on various news reports, and the Plaintiff presented a letter showing that the said G was against the truth.

However, since the above case, many comments were published to insult and criticize the plaintiff on the Internet site of this case.

다. 누군가 C 이 사건 인터넷사이트에 “I”라는 제목으로 원고가 위 사이트 회원들의 악플에 대하여 고소하겠다고 트위터에 쓴 글을 캡쳐하여 게시하자, 피고는 C 16:48:15 “스님이면 절에서 불경이나 쳐 외우라해라 뭔 씨발 스님이건 신부겅 목사건 세금도 안내는 새끼들이 세상정세에 훈장질이냐 ”라는 내용의 댓글을 작성하여 게시하였다. 라.

On July 28, 2014, a summary order was issued to impose a fine of KRW 500,000 on the Defendant, which became final and conclusive around that time, as it became final and conclusive.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 6, Gap evidence 7-1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant used a indecent language on the bulletin board of the Internet site where many unspecified people can confirm the contents of writing, thereby insulting the plaintiff. Since it is evident in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered mental pain, the defendant is obligated to do so in money.

Furthermore, regarding the amount of consolation money, the contents, expressions, quantities, and frequency of the written posted by the defendant.