1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, we affirm the lower court’s judgment that convicted the Defendant of perjury (excluding the portion not guilty of the grounds for appeal) and perjury among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on false accusation, perjury, etc.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record, we affirm the lower court’s finding the Prosecutor not guilty of the facts charged of the instant case’s accusation (excluding the portion of conviction), obstructing business, aiding private documents, and exercising the aforementioned investigation document, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence by violating logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on political party acts.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.