사기
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for two years and six months, respectively.
However, the defendant A is subject to objection.
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 1791" - Defendants' co-principal defendants are Sinnish.
From October 2015, the Defendants lent money equivalent to KRW 2 billion from several persons in order to receive more profits while making an investment in real estate auction from around October 2015. However, there was no verification that real estate investment was made, and no real estate has been awarded a successful bid. As the Defendants received a demand for debt from the creditors because they did not receive a proper payment of profits from C, the Defendants directly verified the real estate to be invested and conspired to pay money to the existing creditors by borrowing money from other persons, as they were highly good in credit.
Defendant
B around March 2017, Defendant A made a false statement to the victim D to the effect that he/she was receiving a large amount of money by making an investment in real estate auction through the denial of a tax accountant. Accordingly, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that, around March 2017, Defendant A was working for the victim D in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building as an employee at the victim D’s office. C is the said certified tax accountant, who is the head of the office, and is in the position of the head of the office, and is conducting a real estate auction. A certified tax accountant is believed to have been able to pay a large amount of money through a real estate auction. A certified tax accountant and the head of the office of the office of the tax accountant was able to obtain a large amount of money. A false statement to the effect that the head of the office of the tax accountant was able to pay the principal three months after the loan and pay the interest of 5% per month.
However, the Defendants and C did not actually make an investment in real estate, and C did not deny the tax accountant, and it was not possible to definitely pay profits within a short period or at least 5% per month through an investment in real estate auction, and the Defendants have already been from October 2015.