A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant C, D, E, and F shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

1. Defendant A and Defendants B conspired to operate the game room in the name of “J Gameland” on the fourth floor of the Daejeon Pungdong-gu I, and Defendant A, as a business owner, had the above game room registered in his own name and had 70 game machine of “sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-air game machine”, which was not classified by the Game Rating Board, to raise funds necessary for the operation of the above game room. Defendant B, in accordance with the instructions given by the said A, had an interview and employed part-time employees by directly interview and employ them, and controlled entry by preparing for crackdowns (CCTV) installed outside the game room, and to exchange points acquired by customers in the game room, and to take charge of overall control over the above game room business.

From April 16, 2013 to 13:00 of the same month, the Defendants conspired to establish a 70 game machine in the above game room from April 16, 2013, and provided it to many unspecified customers with 10,000 won in the game machine, let them input 10,000 won in the game machine, and in the event of the appearance of an item on the game screen where the points are distributed by betting, the Defendants made them perform speculative acts by using game products, such as allowing them to obtain points automatically, and exchanging the remaining points after deducting 10% in the fee from the acquired points, and at the same time, engaged in speculative acts by using speculative electronic gaming machines.

2. Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F served as an employee at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and assisted and abetted the act of speculative acts by providing the said game machine without being classified as above in a game room, despite being aware of the fact that the said game machine was engaged in speculative activities, at the inside the game room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants is K and L.