However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 18, 2017, the Defendant is under the influence of “C” in front of the restaurant in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on December 23:25, 2017. “In the event of an assault,” the Defendant received 112 reports and sent to the site from E (28 taxes) who belongs to the D police unit of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, who called for the site.

” 라는 질문을 받자 “ 개새끼야, 씨 발 놈 아, 싸우자! 맞짱 까자! ”라고 소리치며 욕설을 하고, 계속하여 위 순경 E의 “ 눈썹 부위에서 피가 나는데 누구에게 서 맞은 것이냐

“W.........”

”라고 소리치면서 위 순경 E의 오른쪽 정강이 부위를 피고인의 발로 2회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the above patroler E and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 report processing and protective measures for the main patroler.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision subject to sentencing] under the circumstances that the defendant committed an assault against the police in the course of performing his/her official duties and the nature of the crime is not good, and there are two times the crimes related to violence, each of the favorable circumstances that the defendant reflects the wrong, and the degree of assault is relatively minor, etc. shall be considered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, and the same sentence as the order shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case.