On September 22, 2017, the defendant was detained in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch's branch branch's office's obstruction of business, etc. and currently the trial is pending.

The Defendant, at around 15:00 on March 5, 2016, in the “AV” of the Defendant’s operation located in the BU of Busan, the Defendant: (a) called the AW call center and consulted on the victim AX and the insurance, who is an employee of the Center, would be able to undergo an examination due to the details of the previous accident; and (b) would be replaced by the victim AX; and (c) by the head of the team in charge of Faz., the Defendant would be off to the victim AX, who would be able to participate in the examination due to the details of the previous accident.

B. The victim’s call center’s call center’s customer counseling service was obstructed by force by preventing the victim from engaging in other business in a normal way by repeatedly using abusive and abusive language with a large amount of speech.

In addition, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, took 18 times from that time to March 15, 2017, and obstructed the victims’ work by force by putting abusive language and abusive language to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of AX, AY, BA, BB, BC, BD, BE, BG, BH, BI, BJ, BJ, BK, BL, and BM;

1. Each record (AX, BJ, BN, AY, BY, BD, BB, BF, BG, BP, BI, Q, BH, BR, BE, and BS);

1. Details of receipt of civil petitions;

1. Application of telephone recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommended punishment] [the grounds for sentencing under Article 38(1)2, Article 50 [the scope of recommended punishment] is the subject of aggravation (1 year to 3 years and six months)], where an unspecified or large number of victims, or repeatedly commits a crime against an unspecified or large number of victims for a considerable period of time (a decision on sentencing], the nature of the crime should be bad and repeated punishment should be punished for a considerable period of time. However, the following facts are inconsistent with the crime committed by the defendant around August 22, 2017, which is similar to the crime committed by the defendant around September 22, 2017.