Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. The Defendants are the operators of the E Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and the users of the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital.

B. The Plaintiff is a person who had a history of surgery No. 4-5 in the first half of the 20th century, around 1980, in the middle half of the 30th half of the 1990, in the middle half of the 30th half of the 1990, in the middle half of the 7th half of the 7th radius and in the 7th half of the 2011.

On November 3, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of the fear that the back of the left-hand side, which was launched since about one year before the Defendant Hospital, was added to the Defendant Hospital, and the 5th knife, which is inside the left-hand blood cycle, and the symptoms, etc., which are located outside the upper-hand hand or the upper-hand part of the blood cycle, were raised, and the right shoulder increased and difficult. As a result of the examination and treatment, the Plaintiff argued that the lower-hand part of the Defendant Hospital was accompanied by a vegetable disease, and the lower-hand part of the upper-hand part was 26 cm, the lower-hand part was 24 cm, and the lower-hand part of the right side was expressed.

C. On November 4, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed Medition expansion surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) that expands the right side of the Defendant Hospital Nos. 4-5, 5-6, and 6-7.

From the day following the instant surgery to November 6, 2017, the Plaintiff complained of the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital for the reduction of the sense and gravity of the left-hand arms, and the pain of the right-hand arms.

E. On October 16, 2017, the Plaintiff was determined by the Ministry of Health and Welfare to grade 25% of the normal course of class 2, the gravity of the waterway, the degree of approximately 50% of the normal course of class 3, and the overall decline of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the right be observed by considering the fact that the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the 1 to 5 is not functional but can work to a certain degree, and that the part of the part of the part of the part of the right can work to the right is recognized.

F. The result of this Court’s request for physical appraisal against the Plaintiff, the physical appraisal of the Plaintiff, is broken down against the Plaintiff.