According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and argued mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as well as unfair sentencing as the grounds for appeal, but withdrawn the grounds for appeal of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles on the first trial date of the original

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by mistake or misunderstanding of legal principles cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Furthermore, even if we look at ex officio, there is no violation of the rules of evidence, violation of the rules of evidence, or misapprehension of legal principles.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.