The punishment sentenced by the court below (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the defendant has already been sentenced five times to imprisonment with prison labor due to the same thief crime, the defendant committed the crime in a manner similar to the previous crime during the repeated crime period because he was not in one year after the execution of the last sentence was completed even though he had already been sentenced five times of imprisonment with prison labor due to the same thief crime, in view of the method of committing the crime by which other employees employed in the factory dormitory are stolen by preparing and submitting a false statement in advance and being employed in a disguised employment for larceny, the crime is not good; the victim has committed the crime nine times during the two months; the victim has committed the crime nine times during the nine months; the victim has been preparing for the additional crime, such as the victim's age, family relation, criminal records, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and method of the crime, etc., and all of the circumstances after the crime. Thus, the defendant's assertion that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable is not justified.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act for lack of reason.