2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

On September 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a service agreement (hereinafter “instant first agreement”) with a co-defendant Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial on the research and design of KRW 1,980,000,000 (including value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant project”) with respect to the construction work among the construction works for the land-based distribution business facility development project on the land of the 89-7 and 33 lots of land (hereinafter “instant land”) located on the surface of the wife population 89-7,058 square meters, both of which are located in the Republic of Korea, Pulho-si, Pulchis Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “YI”).

On February 21, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract of KRW 77,00,000 (including value-added tax) with respect to a traffic impact analysis and improvement plan under the instant project (main use distribution facility, site area of 228,291 square meters, total floor area of 61,176 square meters, parking demand of 3,515 square meters, transport demand of 3,515 square meters, and generated transport volume of 17,796 square meters/day of 200 (including value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant second contract”), and on May 24, 2012, the traffic impact analysis and improvement plan deliberation committee completed deliberation on the traffic impact analysis and improvement plan under the Plaintiff’s implementation of the instant contract No. 1 and 2 contracts.

On February 2, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a traffic impact analysis and improvement plan (including value-added tax) based on the instant project (including main storage facilities, 93,737 square meters, 395,739 square meters, parking demand 1,269 square meters, 4,804 square meters, and 2016) with a service cost of KRW 77,00,000 (including value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant third contract”). On March 19, 2013, the Korea Sea Impact Analysis and Improvement Policy Deliberation Committee (hereinafter “instant service contract”) concluded a service contract with a service cost of KRW 7,00,00 (including value-added tax), and completed deliberation on traffic impact analysis and improvement plans conducted by the Plaintiff according to the instant third contract.

The plaintiff is a service price of the first contract of this case from No. 858,00,000,000 won on January 9, 2009, and August 429, 2000. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 10653, Aug. 8, 2011>