beta
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.05.11 2015나23285

판결금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial of the court of first instance are not significantly different from those alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the results of the fact-finding reply to the Mayor of the court of first instance and the Mayor of Yongcheon-si, and the results of the fact-finding reply to the director of the racing tax office, even if all of the results of the response to the submission order to the National Bank of Korea and the NHF Bank were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, the court's reasoning for this case is that "one thousands" in the sixth fourth column of the judgment of the court of first instance is "two thousands," and the result of the fact-finding reply to the Mayor of the court of the court of the first instance, the Mayor of the Si/Ycheon-si, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, and the result of the fact-finding reply to the Mayor of the Si/Ycheon-si, the response of the director of the tax office's order to submit each financial transaction information to the Korean National Bank and the NH Nonghyup Bank as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the result of the response

According to the response of each fact-finding to the Youngcheon City of the court of the trial, according to the results of the response to each order to submit financial transaction information to the National Bank of Korea and the NH Nonghyup Bank of the defendant C as the representative director of the corporation D (hereinafter "D") and deposited the operating fund or the price received from the transaction partner of D into his personal account (U). The defendant C transferred approximately five million won out of the above operating fund to the above management fund to the defendant C. The defendant C transferred the funds from D's national bank account (W) to the above management fund to the defendant C or the defendant C's wife V account. However, it can be recognized that cash withdrawal or substitute withdrawal was made from D's above account. However, the evidence presented in the judgment of the court of the first instance as cited by the trial court and the purport of the entire arguments as a whole.