2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant led to the instant crime and that the instant crime is in an ex post concurrent relationship with the final crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below, etc., the Defendant’s previous crime of narcotics and six times more than that of the Defendant, and that there were several times the previous crime of fraud, the recidivism was committed during the repeated crime period, the Defendant was unable to agree with the defrauded, and the damage was not recovered, and all the sentencing factors, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.