However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 31, 2008, the Defendant was issued a fine of KRW 700,000 by the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on November 12, 2012, the Defendant was issued a fine of KRW 1.5 million by the same court as a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On June 23, 2017, around 22:15, the Defendant driven a B low-speed car at approximately 0.122% of alcohol content in the section of approximately 100 meters of alcohol from the 145-ro 145-ro Man-ro from the south Agricultural Cooperative of Gwangju Mine-gu to the front side of the 90-ro Man-ro 145-ro.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the same summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

A. Unfavorable conditions: The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished twice in 2008 and 2012 due to driving under drinking.

(b) favorable conditions: The defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and there is no record of punishment of suspended execution or more;

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.