2. The judgment that the defendant led to the crime, and there is no particular criminal record, and that the victims' failure to commit an accident going to the first lane by crossinging a four-lane road, which is not a crosswalk, is more favorable to the defendant. However, the victim's injury (the victim E: the victim's injury requiring eight weeks medical treatment, the permanent decline of eyesight due to the right-hand climatic damage, the victim F: the victim's injury requiring 16 weeks medical treatment) is very heavy. The defendant's vehicle is only liable for liability insurance, and it is not sufficient to recover the victims from damage. It is not sufficient to recover from the victim's damage. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the background and result of the instant crime, and the circumstances of the crime, it is not unreasonable to impose the sentence of the court below too too too.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.