Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of the facts charged is erroneous in misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles.

2. In full view of the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the victim specifically stated in the investigation agency about the content of the damage as stated in the facts charged, the victim's injury part and degree also correspond to the victim's statement, and the method and degree of exercising the physical force of the defendant, which can be confirmed through CCTV images, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged, and it is reasonable to view that the above act of the defendant has the nature of active attack beyond a mere defensive act, and therefore, it cannot be viewed as self-defense or legitimate act.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.