beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.18 2017누49838

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument at the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance showed each description of evidence Nos. 5 and 6 submitted at the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is that the reasoning of the first instance judgment is identical to that of Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the “permanent domicile” of Section 3 of the first instance judgment is deemed to be a “permanent domicile.”

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.