However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 3, 2018, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 21:43, the victim D (63 years old) and E (60 years old), a parent of the Defendant, who was the parent of the Defendant at C 104 / 1907 in Busan-gu, Busan-do; (b) the victims were able to listen to the sound of the victims, who were under the influence of drinking in the dwelling area of the victim D (63 years old) and E (60 years old); (c) the victims were not able to believe themselves well without having to pay money; and (d) the victim was able to look at and take a bath after opening the entrance; and (d) the liquid who was in the dwelling after opening the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property by ensuring that the free interest of the fluor and the fluor could not be known of the market price owned by the victims.

2. On April 3, 2018, around 21:55, at the same place as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties, as well as the Defendant: (a) sloping G and patrolmen belonging to the F District of the F District Police Station in Busan, which called the Defendant’s father, put the Defendant into his hand a shoulder glass view (amounting to 15cm in length) which is an object dangerous to the opening of the entrance, and took place outside the door.

D and police officers got to go to the Defendant, and D and police officers called “Gra,” and followed by “Woos, S.,” as the part of H’s string as the strings attached to “S.,” the strings followed by the strings, the above glass angle was placed on the floor, the H’s body was pushed off once, and the h was pushed down on the string side of the slope G, and the strings of the slope G, which was located on the string side of the stairs, was pushed up to the bottom of the stairs, and the G was pushed up.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers with dangerous objects, thereby obstructing police officers' legitimate execution of their duties on dispatch of reports and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, H and G;

1. A report on internal investigation (not accompanied by the E Statement Statement), internal investigation report (112 details of the report and search on the reported site), investigation report (E telephone conversations), investigation report (written application for punishment for E penalty).