beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.14 2013구단1233

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On July 11, 2013, while entering the Marine Industry (hereinafter “instant workplace”) and working for the Marine Industry (hereinafter “instant workplace”), the Plaintiff was subject to occupational accidents involving kneee (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Plaintiff was diagnosed in the hospital “Sleman Slovas, Slovas, Slovas, Slovas, and Slovas, located inside and outside of the instant workplace,” and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant on September 4, 2013.

On September 27, 2013, the Defendant approved the medical care of the “Sslovas-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Madle-Ma

(2) As of July 16, 2013, there is no dispute about the instant disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”), there is a opinion that corresponds to the injury or disease of this case under the close examination by the Plaintiff’s doctor’s own opinion (B) whether the instant disposition is legitimate or not, and there is a opinion that corresponds to the injury or disease of this case conducted at the time of early medical examination by the Plaintiff’s doctor’s opinion. As of July 16, 2013, there is no evidence that, as of the implementation of the operation under spinal anesthesia (e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., r., an advisory.