If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

피고인은 2018. 8. 16. 03:43 경 서울 마포구 양화로 85, 쌍용 자동차 홍대전시장 앞 도로에서 주취상태로 도로의 차량 진행을 막고 있던 중 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 마포 경찰서 B 지구대 순찰 3 팀 소속 순경 C로부터 귀가 권유를 받자, 아무런 이유 없이 화가 나 위 C에게 ‘ 병신 씨 발 새끼, 귓 방망이 존나 게 맞을려고 ’라고 소리치며 오른손 주먹으로 위 C의 머리를 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: The punishment shall be determined, taking into consideration all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., and the fact that the police officer in the course of performing his/her duties has been punished for a crime due to violence.