A. Each sentence (Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and confiscation, and one year each of the remaining Defendants) that the court below sentenced the Defendants to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. The above punishment, which the court below decided against the Defendants, is too unhued and unfair.

2. There is no change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and considering the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, even considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendants and the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the sentence of the court below is too heavy or it does not seem unfair because it is too heavy or unfluent.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.