채무부존재확인
1. On February 14, 2013, at around 13:30 on February 14, 2013, the driver of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the street from the street of a publication bridge located in the Dong-si Dong-dong, Pakistan-si.
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 14, 2013: (a) around 13:30 on February 14, 2013, the Plaintiff driven a C-A-Wed Automobile (hereinafter “Plaintiff-Wed Vehicle”) and proceeded at a speed of about 30 km in speed depending on two lanes among the two-lanes in the east of the Dong-gu High School, toward the road of the original ebbbbbbbs in front of the original ebson in the front of the original ebson. The Plaintiff received the D-Wed Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant-Wed Vehicle”) from the Defendant’s driver’s ebs on the right side of the front ebson in front of the Plaintiff-Wed Vehicle.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
Around February 18, 2013 of the instant accident, the Defendant was diagnosed to require a stability fee and transitional observation for two weeks from the climatic and climatic salt base to be located in the Feminary Department E, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and was hospitalized from that time until March 5, 2013.
C. On August 16, 2013, the Plaintiff was prosecuted for committing a crime of inflicting bodily injury on the Defendant due to the instant accident, and was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 (Seoul High Court Decision 201Da5446), which was a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the Plaintiff filed a request for formal trial (the foregoing Court Decision 2013Da1774). On May 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,000 by the above court.
(B) Although the Plaintiff appealed against this, the dismissal of the appeal was dismissed on September 4, 2014, and the appeal against this was also dismissed) / [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, the purport of Gap evidence 1-2, 3, 4, 4, 5, and Gap evidence 3-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1-2, 2-1, 3-1, 2, 3-2, and 3-1, 2, and 3-1, 3-2, and 3-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the above facts, the accident of this case occurred due to the plaintiff's violation of the plaintiff's signal. Thus, the plaintiff is an accident of this case to the defendant unless there are special circumstances.