공무집행방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 2016. 12. 23. 00:29 경 광주 서구 B에 있는 C 주점 앞 도로에서 신고를 받고 출동한 광주 서부 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 순경 E가 피고인에게 신분증을 제시할 것을 요구하자, “ 씹할 놈들 아, 짭새 새끼들” 이라고 욕하며 배를 내밀어 피해자 순경 E의 몸을 3회 밀치고 오른손으로 순경 E의 멱살을 붙잡고 2회 흔들어 경찰공무원의 112 신고 사건 처리에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes in the police statements made to E, F, G, and A;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or the attitude after the crime is not good, the defendant is the first offender and the victimized police officer is not subject to punishment for the defendant.
In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.