2. It is recognized that the judgment is based on the following facts: the defendant's timing to commit the instant crime and reflects the Defendant; there is no record of punishment for the same crime; the computer used for the instant crime is not so significant as to be 5.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with only 10,00 won received from customers and allowed them to gamble in cash on the game site, and let customers do gambling and perform other speculative acts by exchanging in cash the remaining amount after deducting 10% of the game money acquired by the customers through the game. The act of this case, such as the crime of this case, is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in light of the law on the promotion of the game industry and the legislative intent of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry which intends to establish a healthy game culture for the people, and the crime of this case seems to have been committed closely by putting up the signboard of "C", and it appears that the defendant was trying to actively escape from detection by running the business. In full view of all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's assertion that the above defendant's punishment against the defendant is inappropriate and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.