대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (limited to eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to have committed the crime of this case under the employment of the principal offender C, etc. rather than leading the crime of this case, but it is recognized that the defendant loaned a total of KRW 30 million throughout 137 times in collusion with C, etc. and received interest of KRW 292% to 436% per annum. This is a serious violation of the legislative intent of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users for the purpose of establishing a sound financial order and protecting weak economic power, and its social termination needs to be strictly punished. The defendant performs his role of recovering the interest and principal borrowed for a long period of up to one year. In full view of the above, it cannot be deemed that the degree of participation of the defendant in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be negligible, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case are inappropriate.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.