When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 11:10 on January 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) requested that the address of the C lawyer be known in relation to the criminal case of the Defendant in the Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun; (b) sought that the address of the C lawyer be known in relation to the criminal case of the Defendant; (c) sought that the said attorney’s address be known if the public prosecutor’s office or court becomes known due to the destruction of television, and then, (d) caused damage to the public goods by removing 1 television set of KRW 246,72 of the market price, which was attached on the wall by hand, by removing 1 television set up at 4 times from the toilet door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation, and a report on investigation into assets and goods;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the crime of this case is not good, and that the defendant has a record of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime, etc.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case, and the mistake is divided, the amount of damage is relatively small, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.