beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.04 2020고정163

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2019, from around 13:00 to 14:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) in the ‘Ccafeteria’ located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju; (b) in the order of alcohol, the victim D (e.g., age 57) who is the owner of the business is broken, and (c) changed alcohol and changed alcohol, she gets off, and she again her to her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she she

After that, from 15:30 to 18:30 on the same day, the victim re-enters the above restaurant and changed drinking, and the victim unilaterally kiddds the conversation of other table customers, and kids the table and boomed the table by unilaterally sticking to the conversation of other table customers.

놨다하면서 위협하여 손님들을 나가 버리게 하였다.

In addition, the 112 police officers called 'the Medi service, the Medi service, the Mediet, the Medi service, and the Medition of money, 'the Medition and the Medition of money,' and 'the Medition of people, the Medition of the victim, the her husband of the victim who entered the Mediet restaurant, the Medition of the victim, and the 112 reported on the Medition, and the police officers called for the Medition of the Medition in order to stop home, and interfere with the victim's restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order provided for in Article 334(1) shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant has a record of committing the same kind of crime, the form and period of business interference, the degree of damage caused by business obstruction, the age, character